The Premier League Match Centre has explained why VAR upheld the decision to award a penalty against Andy Robertson for his challenge on Tyler Dibling during Southampton’s match against Liverpool. Despite a lengthy review, VAR determined there was “no conclusive evidence” to overturn the on-field call, as it could not confirm that the contact occurred outside the penalty area.

The Premier League has issued a statement explaining the decision to award Southampton a disputed penalty during their match against Liverpool.

With five minutes left in the first half at St Mary’s, Liverpool’s Virgil van Dijk lost possession while attempting a backheel. Shortly afterward, Southampton’s Tyler Dibling was brought down by Andy Robertson, leading referee Samuel Barrott to award a penalty, surprising many.

Although the decision was closely contested, VAR official Michael Oliver upheld it after an extended review, citing the lack of “conclusive evidence” that the foul occurred outside the penalty area.

Following widespread debate on social media, the Premier League Match Centre clarified the ruling, stating: “The referee’s decision to award a penalty for Robertson’s challenge on Dibling was reviewed and confirmed by VAR, as there was no clear evidence the contact occurred outside the penalty area.”

The incident sparked mixed reactions online. One fan insisted, “That is not a penalty—it’s outside the box,” while another noted, “The foul was just inside, with Robertson’s foot on the line.” Others were more critical, with one accusing VAR of a “scam” and another claiming Liverpool players are unfairly penalized.

Southampton capitalized on the decision, with Adam Armstrong converting the rebound after Caoimhin Kelleher saved the initial penalty, leveling the score for Russell Marti

n’s side.